Friday, December 13, 2019 | 6pm to 8pm
25 W. 43rd Street, Room 1000, New York, NY 10036
Talk Cancelled and Will Be Rescheduled
Set within an all-too-real administrative imaginary of budget cuts, metric-laden assessments, programmatic justifications, and shrinking faculty lines, Ethnic Studies (along with Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies) occupies a decidedly precarious position within the so-termed “corporate university.” If student strikes and Civil Rights movements instantiated the original institutionalization of ethnic studies as a necessary interdisciplinary field of inquiry, the current state of academic affairs reflects a long-standing neoconservative, laissez-faire “planned obsolescence” (to quickly access Kathleen Fitzpatrick’s provocative analytic). Such planning – which took shape vis-à-vis joint appointments, “soft” funding lines, constant restructuring, and divisive resource allocations – has made possible the relatively facile elimination (or “sunsetting”) of African American, Native, Asian American, and Latino/a studies programs across the country. To wit, while the mid-century emergence of Ethnic Studies and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies represented a collegiate revolution via the formation of new departments and academic units, the institutional demise of these programs at the turn-of-the-twenty-first century was nevertheless planned from the outset.
It is against this admittedly dystopic backdrop of planned obsolescence, which reflects and refracts the foci of Flashpoints for Asian American Studies (Fordham University Press 2017), that this presentation considers possible sites and administrative practices of strategic resistance. If, as Kandice Chuh avers, integral to an Asian Americanist critique is the very constructedness of “Asian American” formations, such evaluations potentially prove useful in assessing the past, present, and future of Ethnic Studies. At the same time, the notion that such a critique, according to Lisa Lowe, “tirelessly reckons” with the past engenders a new way of seeing how Ethnic Studies remains resistively “relevant” within and outside the corporate university.
